[Blink] New Blink Qt release 0.4.0 for Windows

Adrian Georgescu ag at ag-projects.com
Fri Jun 28 22:11:34 CEST 2013


One that I know of is csipsimple on Android, it operates internally at 16kHz and there is no audible difference when using OPUS because of this reason.

Adrian

On Jun 28, 2013, at 10:08 PM, Emil Ivov <emcho at jitsi.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 28.06.13, 21:45, Adrian Georgescu wrote:
>> That is because even if OPUS codec can use internally 48KHz sample rate
>> that covers most human audible spectrum, the softphone you have used
>> employs a smaller sampling rate like 8 or 16kHz, which renders the OPUS
>> codec advantages useless, so you cannot hear any difference compared
>> with let's say G722. Unless the whole audio processing chain works at
>> the codec speed speed, the codec performance will not be visible.
> 
> Interesting. I don't think I've ever come across a softphone that does such a thing. Do you have a specific implementation in mind? Is this the one that MCG was referring to?
> 
> MCG, picking a default bitrate is not a simple matter, which is why many implementations allow you to play with it. You may want to try this.
> 
> Some could potentially be adapting it based on RTCP feedback but I don't think any of the current Opus supporting applications do this.
> 
> Cheers,
> Emil
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> https://jitsi.org
> 




More information about the Blink mailing list