[Blink] Blink 0.19.1 consumes relative much CPU (22x) and physical RAM (9x) in comparison to Telephone 0.14.3

Adrian Georgescu ag at ag-projects.com
Fri Jul 9 21:54:35 CEST 2010


Yes we are aware of it

Thanks,
Adrian

On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:22 PM, cerieljacobs wrote:

> The results of Activity Monitor (while both Blink and Telephone applications are idle, and have been running for multiple hours) are:
> 
> Resource	Blink 0.19.1	Telephone 0.14.3	Factor	
> --------------- --------------- ------------------      -------
> %CPU		9.6-10.7%	0.4-0.5%		22.5x
> Phys.memory	101.6 MB	11.5 MB			8.8x	
> --------------- --------------- ------------------      -------
> 
> Hopefully the developers find some space in their roadmap to reduce CPU and memory consumed by a running Blink application.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Ceriel Jacobs
> 
> ---
> My eye caught attention to this because:
> A. I was more closely monitoring RAM and CPU consumption of user window processes, due to a memory leak in Firefox+Firebug+Mobotix Live view.
> B. While being in the transition from Telephone 0.14.3 (due to lack of development and lower audio quality of calls) to Blink, I am running both app simultaneous.
> C. Blink consumed more CPU resource than an actively running Firefox 3.6.6 with 10+ extensions enabled 
> _______________________________________________
> Blink mailing list
> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
> 




More information about the Blink mailing list