[Blink] Blink 0.19.1 consumes relative much CPU (22x) and physical RAM (9x) in comparison to Telephone 0.14.3
Adrian Georgescu
ag at ag-projects.com
Fri Jul 9 21:54:35 CEST 2010
Yes we are aware of it
Thanks,
Adrian
On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:22 PM, cerieljacobs wrote:
> The results of Activity Monitor (while both Blink and Telephone applications are idle, and have been running for multiple hours) are:
>
> Resource Blink 0.19.1 Telephone 0.14.3 Factor
> --------------- --------------- ------------------ -------
> %CPU 9.6-10.7% 0.4-0.5% 22.5x
> Phys.memory 101.6 MB 11.5 MB 8.8x
> --------------- --------------- ------------------ -------
>
> Hopefully the developers find some space in their roadmap to reduce CPU and memory consumed by a running Blink application.
>
> Kind regards,
> Ceriel Jacobs
>
> ---
> My eye caught attention to this because:
> A. I was more closely monitoring RAM and CPU consumption of user window processes, due to a memory leak in Firefox+Firebug+Mobotix Live view.
> B. While being in the transition from Telephone 0.14.3 (due to lack of development and lower audio quality of calls) to Blink, I am running both app simultaneous.
> C. Blink consumed more CPU resource than an actively running Firefox 3.6.6 with 10+ extensions enabled
> _______________________________________________
> Blink mailing list
> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
>
More information about the Blink
mailing list