[Blink] Blink 0.19.1 consumes relative much CPU (22x) and physical RAM (9x) in comparison to Telephone 0.14.3

[Adrian Georgescu]

This high CPU usage occurs with the the mac built-in audio device, external USB devices do not exhibit this anomaly.

Regards,
Adrian


On Jul 9, 2010, at 10:54 PM, Adrian Georgescu wrote:

> Yes we are aware of it
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> On Jul 9, 2010, at 6:22 PM, cerieljacobs wrote:
> 
>> The results of Activity Monitor (while both Blink and Telephone applications are idle, and have been running for multiple hours) are:
>> 
>> Resource	Blink 0.19.1	Telephone 0.14.3	Factor	
>> --------------- --------------- ------------------      -------
>> %CPU		9.6-10.7%	0.4-0.5%		22.5x
>> Phys.memory	101.6 MB	11.5 MB			8.8x	
>> --------------- --------------- ------------------      -------
>> 
>> Hopefully the developers find some space in their roadmap to reduce CPU and memory consumed by a running Blink application.
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Ceriel Jacobs
>> 
>> ---
>> My eye caught attention to this because:
>> A. I was more closely monitoring RAM and CPU consumption of user window processes, due to a memory leak in Firefox+Firebug+Mobotix Live view.
>> B. While being in the transition from Telephone 0.14.3 (due to lack of development and lower audio quality of calls) to Blink, I am running both app simultaneous.
>> C. Blink consumed more CPU resource than an actively running Firefox 3.6.6 with 10+ extensions enabled 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blink mailing list
>> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
>> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Blink mailing list
> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
>