[SIP Beyond VoIP] Another case where Sylk would reject Notifications

Adrian Georgescu ag at ag-projects.com
Fri Nov 16 11:43:30 CET 2012

Sure, if the PIDF payload in the PIDF conveys this information. Does it?


On Nov 16, 2012, at 11:38 AM, Hadzhiev, Tihomir wrote:

> Hi all,
> I have finally applied a workaround on the Record-Route field, so now it is not populated with FQDNs, instead there are IP addresses and ports.
> e.g. Sylk does not crash anymore and I have the following in Sylk’s ( --no-fork ) log:
> [xmppgateway] Presence session established sip:alice at open-ims.test --> xmpp:tihoparvi at testing.com
> [xmppgateway] Presence session established xmpp:tihoparvi at testing.com --> sip:alice at open-ims.test
> E.g. it looks like the presence is established correctly.
> But now a question.
> Once the above presence is established correctly, am I supposed to see the green light ( e.g. user online ) at the XMPP Client for the guy at the SIP end ?
> Thanks,
> Tiho
> This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you for understanding.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ag-projects.com/pipermail/sipbeyondvoip/attachments/20121116/d22f4c8b/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the SIPBeyondVoIP mailing list