[Blink] Blink - DTMF problem

[José Pablo Méndez Soto]

> Since this is not the first time I hear about bogus endpoints that are
incapable of dealing with DTMF if payload type is not 101, I'll look into
it and see if we can change it.
>

Saúl, Cisco Callmanager servers or Asterisk servers have the option to
select the DTMF payload type, wouldn´t it be useful to select on a
per-account base the payload type to use?


*José Pablo Méndez *


On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 2:42 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
<saul at ag-projects.com>wrote:

>
> On Dec 23, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Jarosław Teterycz <Jarek at jtk.com.pl> wrote:
>
> > So maybe small trick: additional option to simulate G729 and then just
> report in negotiation that it is supported but use DTMF inline in practice?
> >
>
> Not really sure what you mean by that. Negotiation is a generic process if
> I "simulate" to support G729 endpoints would negotiate that with me and
> they'd hear nothing.
>
> Since this is not the first time I hear about bogus endpoints that are
> incapable of dealing with DTMF if payload type is not 101, I'll look into
> it and see if we can change it.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
> AG Projects
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blink mailing list
> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ag-projects.com/pipermail/blink/attachments/20131223/ab1f7069/attachment.html>