[Blink] Multitrack recording of conference calls

Adrian Georgescu ag at ag-projects.com
Mon Aug 1 21:44:11 CEST 2011


Well,

This can be easily done design-wise in SylkServer used as server side conferencing for Blink, is more than ready to accommodate such feature.  But as always is the kind of super cool stuff that takes weeks or months of develop for which the target few customer will be reluctant even to pay even 1.99.

If anyone knows Python and has time and interest we can guide them to achieve this feature.

Adrian

On Aug 1, 2011, at 9:23 PM, <mgraves at mstvp.com> <mgraves at mstvp.com> wrote:

> I've occasionally wish for the same kind of ability to record each
> stream individually, retaining the potential of later post-production.
> The only way to do this is at the point of the central conference
> server, but normal conference servers won't do it.
> 
> In a normal conference each participant gets fed a mixed stream that is
> all the other participants, except themselves. In production audio we
> call this mix-1. Their own audio returning to them post-mix would be
> delayed and so very disconcerting.
> 
> So it is that a conference server is actually performing multiple mixes
> in real-time, with each participant getting their own mix. In practice
> this can be optimized by accounting for the fact that quite frequently
> many of the attendees don't actually participate. That group can be sent
> a common mixed feed at least until such time as one of them starts to
> speak.
> 
> In order to record each stream separately you'd need to architect a
> conference server around that desire, having it stream each caller to a
> file on disk before any mixing occurs. It doesn't seem all that
> difficult, but could be very IO intensive.
> 
> Michael Graves
> mgraves  mstvp.com
> o(713) 861-4005
> c(713) 201-1262
> sip:mjgraves at mstvp.onsip.com
> skype mjgraves
> 
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [Blink] Multitrack recording of conference calls
>> From: Adrian Georgescu <ag at ag-projects.com>
>> Date: Mon, August 01, 2011 5:07 am
>> To: Blink Support Forum <blink at lists.ag-projects.com>
>> 
>> 
>> As you say, you want to do my own mixing outside of Blink. So this is another application that needs to be developed it has nothing to do with Blink.
>> 
>> On Aug 1, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Kyle Cronin wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm not looking to record mixed audio, I'm looking to record unmixed
>>> audio - I'd like to do the mixing myself, after I edit it. Is there a
>>> way to do that in Blink?
>>> 
>>> On Aug 1, 2011, at 5:59 AM, Adrian Georgescu <ag at ag-projects.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> It can be by either but still the same principle apply. The point of recording is not relevant, any place is as good as the other.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Aug 1, 2011, at 11:41 AM, Kyle Cronin wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Ah, so you're saying that in a conference the audio is mixed by the
>>>>> server and not by the client?
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Adrian Georgescu <ag at ag-projects.com> wrote:
>>>>>> In a conference, the audio is mixed so there is no such thing as individual channels, all users get to hear the very same data.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> So you can record at any client or in the mixing server and then distribute the file.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Aug 1, 2011, at 10:34 AM, Kyle Cronin wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I'm looking for some software that facilitates the recording of
>>>>>>> multiple parties to a conference call by sending the audio from each
>>>>>>> participant to separate channels of the output device. Barring that, a
>>>>>>> recording of the conference with each participant having their own
>>>>>>> track or file would also be acceptable. My reason for needing this is
>>>>>>> that I wish to streamline my podcasting process and having each
>>>>>>> participant on their own track makes the editing easier and the
>>>>>>> overall quality better as each participant's audio can be tweaked
>>>>>>> independently.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The Blink Lite version clearly does not have this functionality, but
>>>>>>> I'm wondering if the Pro version does, or plans to in the future. I
>>>>>>> don't imagine I'm the only one with this problem and no other free to
>>>>>>> inexpensive software seems to solve it, so there's definitely value in
>>>>>>> providing this feature.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks for your time and attention,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Kyle
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Blink mailing list
>>>>>>> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
>>>>>>> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Blink mailing list
>>>>>> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
>>>>>> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
>>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Blink mailing list
>>>>> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
>>>>> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Blink mailing list
>>>> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
>>>> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blink mailing list
>>> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
>>> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blink mailing list
>> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
>> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Blink mailing list
> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
> 




More information about the Blink mailing list