[Blink] Digest user

[Malcolm Caldwell]

Hi Adrian,

> From: Adrian Georgescu <ag at ag-projects.com>
> Reply-To: <blink at lists.ag-projects.com>
> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:18:36 +0200
> To: <blink at lists.ag-projects.com>
> Subject: Re: [Blink] Digest user
> 
> If Register succeeds this time, than Blink works as far as
> Authentication with different username is concerned.

That is exactly what I think is happening.

> About not being able to receive calls:
> 
> 1. Do you see the Invite coming in Blink? Check the Logs SIP window.

Today, when I was at work looking at this I saw invites in the logs, but
they did not make sense (they said our callmanager was sending INVITEs to
private 172.X.X.X addresses).

Tonight I tried to register through a VPN back to work, and cannot see
invites.

What I an see is that BLINK is registered on our callmanager using the wrong
IP address: it picked the address of the local network, not the address of
the VPN connection.  This can be seen in the contact header.

So, I think that blink is registering the wrong IP address.  I will try
tomorrow to find out where blink was getting that 172.X.X.X private address
from. (I did not think I had any interfaces up with private addresses)

Here is the REGISTER that has the wrong IP (ie not the VPN address).

SENDING: Packet 124, +0:23:11.657543
2010-04-29 22:37:18.257835: 192.168.1.129:63001 -(SIP over UDP)->
SIP.SERVER.IP.ADDR:5060
REGISTER sip:pbx1.cdu.edu.au SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 
192.168.1.129:63001;rport;branch=z9hG4bKPjbNek-zd4VY-NZlX9UElrXFUzNg4aZA3W
Max-Forwards: 70
From: "u" <sip:XXXX at server.company.com>;tag=IF455wenJp6bvknmKl.x3SSvCmtZjwag
To: "u" <sip:XXXX at server.company.com>
Contact: <sip:koajntgp at 192.168.1.129:63001>
Call-ID: Krpq.k245qGhckA7kTOl883wh7XAoi9P
CSeq: 8 REGISTER
Route: <sip:SIP.SERVER.IP.ADDR;lr>
Expires: 600
User-Agent: blink-0.18.1
Content-Length:  0

> 2. If no INVITE comes in then you can only check in Cisco Call
> Manager, what does it say?
> 
> Regards,
> Adrian
> 
> 
> On Apr 29, 2010, at 10:16 AM, Malcolm Caldwell wrote:
> 
>> Hi Adrian,
>> 
>> I can confirm that the new version has this feature, but for some
>> reason it
>> is not working for me.
>> 
>> It works in that I can register: I can see that it is registered
>> both on
>> cisco callmanager and in the Blink UI
>> 
>> What does not work is I do not receive the calls.  I am fairly sure
>> the
>> issue is with blink.
>> 
>> Perhaps I should capture some logs?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> From: Adrian Georgescu <ag at ag-projects.com>
>>> Reply-To: <blink at lists.ag-projects.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:22:24 +0200
>>> To: <blink at lists.ag-projects.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Blink] Digest user
>>> 
>>> We will add this feature into the next release.
>>> 
>>> Adrian
>>> 
>>> On Apr 13, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Malcolm Caldwell wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Hello,
>>>> 
>>>> Is it possible to register to a sip server using a digest
>>>> authentication user that is different from the sip address?
>>>> 
>>>> I am trying to register blink against cisco call manager.  While I
>>>> need to register as NNNN at address.of.server.com, where NNNN is an
>>>> extension number, I need to authenticate as a regular user.
>>>> 
>>>> Is this currently possible?
>>>> 
>>>> Malcolm Caldwell
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Blink mailing list
>>>> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
>>>> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blink mailing list
>>> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
>>> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blink mailing list
>> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
>> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Blink mailing list
> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink