[Blink] router configuration?

Adrian Georgescu ag at ag-projects.com
Fri Feb 25 14:30:26 CET 2011


According to your trace Blink sends messages out but receives no replies. Someone somewhere must be blocking your packets. 

SENDING: Packet 41, +0:01:41.066466
2011-01-27 21:29:47.899168: 10.0.0.22:56532 -(SIP over UDP)-> 195.130.154.224:5060
REGISTER sip:195.130.154.224 SIP/2.0

SENDING: Packet 42, +0:02:18.272735
2011-01-27 21:30:25.105437: 10.0.0.22:56532 -(SIP over UDP)-> 195.130.154.224:5060
REGISTER sip:195.130.154.224 SIP/2.0

SENDING: Packet 43, +0:02:18.772830
2011-01-27 21:30:25.605532: 10.0.0.22:56532 -(SIP over UDP)-> 195.130.154.224:5060
REGISTER sip:195.130.154.224 SIP/2.0

SENDING: Packet 44, +0:02:19.773553
2011-01-27 21:30:26.606255: 10.0.0.22:56532 -(SIP over UDP)-> 195.130.154.224:5060
REGISTER sip:195.130.154.224 SIP/2.0

SENDING: Packet 45, +0:02:21.774014
2011-01-27 21:30:28.606716: 10.0.0.22:56532 -(SIP over UDP)-> 195.130.154.224:5060
REGISTER sip:195.130.154.224 SIP/2.0

Adrian

On Feb 25, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Philippe Faes wrote:

> Hi 
> 
> There's not such configuration in my router either. As I said earlier, another SIP client (on my smartphone) works fine. I don't use them at the same time.
> I'd be more than happy to purchase Blink on the Apps Store if it would work...
> 
> 
> Philippe
> --
> Philippe Faes
> Sint-Denijslaan 91
> 9000 Gent
> 0494 87 22 72
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Dean Willis <dean.willis at softarmor.com> wrote:
> 
> On Feb 9, 2011, at 8:49 AM, Adrian Georgescu wrote:
> 
> > Hi Dean,
> >
> > 9 out 10 connectivity problems are SIP ALG related. The rest are firewalls that explicitly block SIP traffic.
> >
> > Most if not all residential routers have nowadays a broken SIP-ALG inside. No manufacturer really understands SIP so they do not even acknowledge that they break things by adding such 'support' into their routers, forget about fixing their implementation that was completely un-necessary in the first place. All SIP providers have a NAT traversal solution in place that simply works.  The only way to eradicate the SIP ALG plague is to mandate the usage of TLS for SIP transport in a future iteration of the SIP protocol specs. And the chance of this happening is close to zero...
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> > On Feb 5, 2011, at 6:51 AM, Dean Willis wrote:
> 
> I haven't found a SIP ALG in any of the home NAT routers I have, and I've accumulated a fairly large collection. Of course, there might be one there, but if so it hasn't caused me enough trouble that I've had to find it yet.
> 
> --
> Dean
> _______________________________________________
> Blink mailing list
> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Blink mailing list
> Blink at lists.ag-projects.com
> http://lists.ag-projects.com/mailman/listinfo/blink

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ag-projects.com/pipermail/blink/attachments/20110225/67b1dfdc/attachment.html>


More information about the Blink mailing list